Crime does not occur randomly or uniformly in time or space, or society. Crimes do not happen randomly or uniformly across all hotels the same way. Arguing for uniformity was once popular, but now seems indefensible. However, we do know about hotspots and coldspots; there are high repeat offenders and high repeat victims. In fact, the two groups are frequently linked. While the numbers will continue to be debated depending on the definition and the population being tested, David Farrington once said, “a very small proportion of people actually commit most of the known crimes.”
The argument for the complete randomness of targets and victims is no longer plausible. For example, bar fights occur with greater frequency on weekend nights rather than on weekday afternoons, shoplifting occurs during a restricted set of hours in the day and more in some stores than others, theft in occupied hotel rooms generally happens during the daytime, and break-ins into vehicles in the garage can happen almost around the clock.
Theft is most likely to occur when security measures are inadequate, and the design of the hotel is inviting for criminals. No or poor CCTV coverage, poor lighting in the hotel garage or carpark, barriers to access residential floors, hidden spots, and no bollards for safety reasons to prevent a vehicle-borne attack are the signals criminals receive. While a sophisticated design concept becomes less attractive for criminals, opportunists will still try to take advantage of a busy environment. While some criminals love the challenges, others just cannot gauge the difficulties they face.
This report was contributed by knowledge partner:
The post Understanding crime patterns and hotspots in the context of hotel security design appeared first on Food&HotelAsia.